The student must evaluate the effectiveness of the product based on feedback from the client/adviser. This must include direct references to the success criteria identified in criterion A.
The student must recommend proposals for the future improvement of the product.
Marks
Description
0
The response does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–2
There is a limited attempt to evaluate the product against the success criteria identified in criterion A. There is limited evidence of feedback from the client/adviser and any recommendations for further improvement are trivial or unrealistic.
3–4
The product is partially evaluated against the success criteria identified in criterion A including feedback from the client/adviser. Recommendations for further improvement of the product are largely realistic.
5–6
The product is fully evaluated against the success criteria identified in criterion A including feedback from the client/adviser. Recommendations for further improvement of the product are realistic.
IA Criteria E
Edit 0 1…Guidance for the development of the internal assessment
https://ibpublishing.ibo.org/live-exist/rest/app/tsm.xql?doc=d_4_comsc_tsm_1201_2_e&part=4&chapter=4
Criterion E: Evaluation (6 marks)
IA check list part E:
http://ib.compscihub.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IA-Part-E-checklist.pdf
Criterion E – Evaluation – 6 marks
http://ib.compscihub.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/E.pdf
IA samples (check for evaluations):
https://ibpublishing.ibo.org/live-exist/rest/app/tsm.xql?doc=d_4_comsc_tsm_1201_2_e&part=4&chapter=7